Women's Ordination: What the Study Committee's Positions Argue From Scripture

1. Issue framed

Does Scripture limit ordination as elder or pastor to qualified men, or does it allow women to be ordained?

The question has a long history. It also has recent dated discussion. Before the 2025 General Conference Session, Spectrum listed gender and ordination among its storylines to watch. Adventist Today reported on July 15, 2025 that GC President Erton Köhler told the AP he was not opening discussion of women's ordination. Adventist Today quotes the AP report: "It's not the moment to do that," Köhler said. We did not check the 2025 Session's final proceedings, so this piece makes no claim about what was or was not acted on there.

2. Documented positions in view

The Final Report of the Theology of Ordination Study Committee (June 2014; 106 members) contains three position summaries.

• Position Summary #1 sets out what it calls the biblical qualifications for elder or pastor. It concludes that the Bible and Ellen White give no "clear support for the ordination of women to the gospel ministry." It also says it upholds "the right and duty of women to serve God actively and fully in ministry of various kinds."
• Position Summary #2 argues that Genesis 1–3 sets out no hierarchy of the sexes before the Fall, and that nothing in Scripture prevents women from "full and equal participation" in ministry.
• Position Summary #3 proposes "a general rule of male ordained ministerial leadership, which can be varied from," with the decision left to each field.

The report states that the committee reached no single recommendation on women's ordination. It did vote a consensus statement on the theology of ordination itself.

3. Scriptural arguments attributed and compared

1 Timothy 3:2 and Titus 1:6 ("husband of one wife"). Position 1 notes that this qualification appears in two letters written to two different settings. From that it concludes the instruction applies to "the church at large for all time."

Position 2 says the same phrase is used for deacons (1 Timothy 3:12), and it holds that women served as deacons. On that reading, the phrase is "gender specific" but "not gender exclusive," and its point is sexual faithfulness. Position 2 compares it with "wife of one husband" for widows (1 Timothy 5:9).

1 Timothy 2:11–14. Position 1 reads Paul's appeal to creation order ("Adam was formed first," 2:13) as grounding a universal principle that goes beyond culture.

Position 2 reads the passage against the false teaching in Ephesus (1:3; 5:13). It argues that the women there were barred from teaching because they had been deceived, not because they were women. It also argues that the rare Greek verb translated "to have authority over" in 2:12 does not mean ordinary church authority.

Genesis 1–3. Position 1 says Adam's priority in creation and Eve being presented as a "helper" (Genesis 2:18–24) show different roles alongside equal worth. Position 2 says the husband's rule in Genesis 3:16 comes after the Fall as a remedy, not as a creation ordinance, and is limited to marriage.

Old Testament women leaders. Position 2 points to Deborah as both prophet and judge, with authority over men (Judges 4–5). It also cites Miriam (Micah 6:4) and Huldah. Position 1's summary deals instead with Israel's male priesthood and with New Testament leaders. On 1 Peter 2:9, it says "the apostles and elders were established as leaders, and all of them were males."

Junia (Romans 16:7). That apostles and elders were all male is Position 1's argument, not an agreed fact. Romans 16:7 is a disputed text. Position 1 quotes it in the ESV wording, saying Andronicus and Junia were "well-known to the apostles," and finds "no clear evidence" that any of the women named held church leadership. Other translations render the phrase differently. In the final report's text, Position 2 does not discuss Junia. An Inter-American Division summary lists Junia among Position 2's examples; the summary may be drawing on other committee papers. Position 2 does note that the New Testament also uses "apostle" for missionaries (e.g., Acts 14:14).

Position 3. Its Annual Council presentation says it agrees with each of the other two positions at some points. It grounds its proposal in mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21).

4. Historical and teaching context

On July 8, 2015, the General Conference Session voted 1,381 to 977, with five abstentions, on one specific motion. The motion asked whether division executive committees could, "as they may deem it appropriate in their territories, make provision for the ordination of women to the gospel ministry."

The motion was defeated. That vote decided that question of policy. It did not adopt a doctrinal statement. This piece does not describe the church's wider rules on credentials or ordination.

Belief 14 says differences between "male and female must not be divisive among us." Belief 17 cites 1 Timothy 3:1–13 on pastoral functions. Each position appeals to these statements.

5. Agreements and disagreements

Common ground the summaries themselves document.

• All three positions say women are called to ministry.
• All three appeal to Scripture as the final authority.
• The committee's consensus statement on the theology of ordination was adopted.

Disagreements. The positions differ on:

• whether male leadership in Scripture is a binding norm or a descriptive pattern
• how to read 1 Timothy 2–3 in its setting
• how to understand the pre-Fall order in Genesis 2
• whether a world church can allow regional variation

6. Implications and uncertainties

The 2015 policy vote is documented. Whether the question will be formally revisited is unknown.

Sources (7)

• Fundamental Beliefs — Official
• ANN, "Delegates Vote 'No' on Issue of Women's Ordination" (July 9, 2015) — Official
• Final TOSC Report (June 2014) — Primary Documents
• Position 3 presentation to Annual Council 2014 — Primary Documents
• Inter-American Division, TOSC summary (Sept 2014) — Global & Regional
• Spectrum, "Five Stories We're Watching" (July 2025) — Independent Progressive
• Adventist Today, Köhler AP interview report (July 15, 2025) — Independent Progressive

Source categories describe type only, not reliability. About our source categories.

Cite this

Women's Ordination: What the Study Committee's Positions Argue From Scripture. Puls Strom, Nov 6, 2026. https://pulsstrom.com/c/8a5d0c

Copy linkCopy citation

Spotted an error? Report it. Substantive corrections are noted at the top of the piece and listed on the corrections page.